Player Stats

Trayion Durham College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,422
Rushing yards
3,080
Receiving yards
342
Touchdowns
27

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonKent State1058457014461.1
2012 PostseasonKent State14876819082.2
2012 Regular SeasonKent State141,4101,2481621482.2
2013 Regular SeasonKent State12913766147664.2
2014 Regular SeasonKent State00000-
2015 Regular SeasonKent State124284280341.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Kent State paired 1,497 primary output with 50 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 31.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Marshall

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Kent State

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

35.7

Efficiency

31.2

Usage

20.3

Consistency

49.4

Best Game by takeover score

Marshall

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 10. Delaware State: 77. Minnesota: 4. Marshall: 114. Miami (OH): 49. Toledo: 36. Massachusetts: 11. Bowling Green: 7. Buffalo: 38. Ohio: 26. Central Michigan: 46. Akron: 10

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 4 by 26. Delaware State: 15 by 53.5. Minnesota: 2 by 20.8. Marshall: 31 by 38.3. Miami (OH): 18 by 28.4. Toledo: 13 by 28.8. Massachusetts: 5 by 22.9. Bowling Green: 5 by 14.6. Buffalo: 9 by 44. Ohio: 7 by 38.7. Central Michigan: 11 by 43.6. Akron: 7 by 14.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins45.7 · Games = 3 · +13.3 vs Losses
Losses32.3 · Games = 9 · -13.3 vs Wins