Usage Score
6.2
Player Dossier
2024-2025SMU
LB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Desoto, TX, USA
Brandon Booker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.2
Efficiency
29.4
Consistency
38.5
Season Value
43.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · SMU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Booker, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · SMU. Brandon Booker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.4 disruption score.
Brandon Booker played LB for SMU. Across 2 tracked seasons, Brandon Booker recorded 79 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
SMU paired 9.5 primary output with 29.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
29.4
Usage
6.2
Consistency
38.5
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 0. East Texas A&M: 0. Baylor: 0.5. Missouri State: 2. TCU: 1. Syracuse: 0. Stanford: 1. Clemson: 0.5. Wake Forest: 2. Miami: 0. Boston College: 1. Louisville: 1.5. California: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 7 by 29.2. East Texas A&M: 5 by 20.8. Baylor: 8 by 38.3. Missouri State: 5 by 40.8. TCU: 8 by 43.3. Syracuse: 3 by 12.5. Stanford: 4 by 26.7. Clemson: 4 by 21.7. Wake Forest: 4 by 36.7. Miami: 5 by 20.8. Boston College: 0 by 10. Louisville: 8 by 48.3. California: 8 by 33.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Missouri State
Best efficiency game
48.3 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Arizona | W 24-19 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/30 | @ California | L 35-38 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Louisville | W 38-6 | 8 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Boston College | W 45-13 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Miami | W 26-20 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Wake ForestSplash game | L 12-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Clemson | W 35-24 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Stanford | W 34-10 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Syracuse | W 31-18 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ TCU | L 24-35 | 8 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Missouri StateSplash game | W 28-10 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Baylor | L 45-48 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs East Texas A&M | W 42-13 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Postseason | SMU | 0 | 6 | 1 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | SMU | 9.5 | 29.4 | 6.2 | 9.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 9.5 | 29.4 | 6.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Missouri State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
#2
Louisville
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#3
Wake Forest
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#4
TCU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 34.3 takeover score.
#5
Stanford
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 27.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · SMU
9.5 primary output · 29.4 efficiency · 6.2 usage
43.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · SMU
43.5
9.5 primary · 29.4 efficiency · 6.2 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · SMU
35.7
0 primary · 6 efficiency · 1 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8706
DeSoto · DeSoto, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
79
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.