Player Stats

Jordan Fredrick College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
509
Receptions
47
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonWisconsin0-00-
2012 PostseasonWisconsin1214167.8
2012 Regular SeasonWisconsin1216192067.8
2013 Regular SeasonWisconsin610106059
2014 PostseasonWisconsin819049.5
2014 Regular SeasonWisconsin812117049.5
2015 Regular SeasonWisconsin6781051.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Wisconsin paired 196 primary output with 70 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 68.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Hawai'i

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

13.5

Efficiency

68.3

Usage

7.2

Consistency

72.3

Best Game by takeover score

Hawai'i

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 17. Hawai'i: 22. Iowa: 12. Nebraska: 9. Rutgers: 19. Minnesota: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 2 by 56.7. Hawai'i: 1 by 100. Iowa: 1 by 80. Nebraska: 1 by 60. Rutgers: 1 by 100. Minnesota: 1 by 13.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins13.8 · Games = 5 · +1.8 vs Losses
Losses12 · Games = 1 · -1.8 vs Wins