Usage / Role
72%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2012Purdue
RB • 5'11" • Texarkana, TX, USA
Akeem Shavers leans balanced backfield option traits and 59.1 efficiency.
Usage / Role
72%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
93
Top-tier box-score impact for a back
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
68
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Purdue
Snapshot
Player Story
Akeem Shavers built his college career from 2011 through 2012 as a running back from Texarkana, TX wearing No. 24, spending time with Purdue. The clearest part of Akeem Shavers' career was his backfield work: 1,390...
Read the storyAkeem Shavers, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Purdue. Akeem Shavers leans balanced backfield option traits and 59.1 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 12 | 149 | 149 | 0 | 0 | 46.7 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 12 | 428 | 370 | 58 | 7 | 46.7 |
| 2012 Postseason | Purdue | 13 | 147 | 93 | 54 | 0 | 74.1 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 13 | 1,094 | 778 | 316 | 9 | 74.1 |
Related Context
Akeem Shavers played RB for Purdue. Across 2 tracked seasons, Akeem Shavers recorded 1,390 rushing yards, 428 receiving yards, and 16 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Purdue paired 1,241 primary output with 59.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 59.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
95.5
Efficiency
59.1
Usage
25.9
Consistency
63.1
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 147. Eastern Kentucky: 81. Notre Dame: 59. Eastern Michigan: 65. Marshall: 73. Michigan: 54. Wisconsin: 50. Ohio State: 123. Minnesota: 90. Penn State: 57. Iowa: 118. Illinois: 99. Indiana: 225
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 18 by 75.5. Eastern Kentucky: 12 by 70.2. Notre Dame: 13 by 38.2. Eastern Michigan: 12 by 57.6. Marshall: 25 by 30.4. Michigan: 10 by 43.8. Wisconsin: 9 by 57.9. Ohio State: 10 by 76.8. Minnesota: 12 by 75.6. Penn State: 7 by 83.9. Iowa: 20 by 48.1. Illinois: 22 by 48.2. Indiana: 29 by 61.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
83.9 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-58 | 14 | 93 | 6.60 | 0 | 4 | 54 | 8.2 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Indiana100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 56-35 | 27 | 126 | 4.70 | 1 | 2 | 99 | 7.8 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Illinois | W 20-17 | 21 | 99 | 4.70 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.5 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Iowa | W 27-24 | 17 | 64 | 3.80 | 1 | 3 | 54 | 5.9 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn State | L 9-34 | 7 | 57 | 8.10 | 0 | — | — | 8.1 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Minnesota | L 28-44 | 11 | 78 | 7.10 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 7.5 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Ohio State | L 22-29 | 7 | 30 | 4.30 | 0 | 3 | 93 | 12.3 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | L 14-38 | 9 | 50 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Michigan | L 13-44 | 10 | 34 | 3.40 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Marshall | W 51-41 | 25 | 73 | 2.90 | 1 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 54-16 | 10 | 56 | 5.60 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-20 | 12 | 37 | 3.10 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 4.5 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Eastern Kentucky | W 48-6 | 11 | 74 | 6.70 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6.8 |
Player Story
Akeem Shavers built his college career from 2011 through 2012 as a running back from Texarkana, TX wearing No. 24, spending time with Purdue. The clearest part of Akeem Shavers' career was his backfield work: 1,390 rushing yards, 292 carries, 12 rushing touchdowns, and 428 receiving yards across 25 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2012 with Purdue. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 428 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 25 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Purdue.
The arc is straightforward: Akeem Shavers moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2011-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 577 | 43.3 | 16.6 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 577 | 43.3 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Purdue | 1,241 | 59.1 | 25.9 | 664 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 1,241 | 59.1 | 25.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Western Michigan
Week 1 · W 37-32 · Postseason
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
149
Scrimmage Yards
87.7 takeover
149 scrimmage yards and 32.4 usage.
#2
vs Indiana
Week 13 · W 56-35 · Conference game
225
Scrimmage Yards
87.2 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
225 scrimmage yards and 49.2 usage.
#3
@ Oklahoma State
Week 1 · L 14-58 · Postseason
147
Scrimmage Yards
76.5 takeover
Loss with 147 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
147 scrimmage yards and 31 usage.
#4
@ Illinois
Week 12 · W 20-17 · Conference game
99
Scrimmage Yards
64.1 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
99 scrimmage yards and 39.3 usage.
#5
@ Iowa
Week 11 · W 27-24 · Conference game
118
Scrimmage Yards
60.7 takeover
Win with 118 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
118 scrimmage yards and 28.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Purdue
1,241 primary output · 59.1 efficiency · 25.9 usage
74.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · Purdue
74.1
1,241 primary · 59.1 efficiency · 25.9 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Purdue
46.7
577 primary · 43.3 efficiency · 16.6 usage
2
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.