Usage Score
9.5
Player Dossier
2011-2015Purdue
WR • 6'4" • Zionsville, IN, USA
Shane Mikesky reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.5
Efficiency
68.9
Consistency
53.5
Season Value
48.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shane Mikesky, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Purdue. Shane Mikesky reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Purdue paired 186 primary output with 66.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
23.8
Efficiency
68.9
Usage
9.5
Consistency
53.5
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 49. Wisconsin: 27. Illinois: 17. Northwestern: 7. Iowa: 19
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 3 by 60. Illinois: 3 by 37.8. Northwestern: 1 by 46.7. Iowa: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 5 | 16.7 | 4 | 5 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 186 | 66.4 | 11.8 | 181 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | -186 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 119 | 68.9 | 9.5 | 119 |
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49
Primary metric
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
5
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#5
Wisconsin
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Purdue
186 primary output · 66.4 efficiency · 11.8 usage
60.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
48.9
119 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 9.5 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Purdue
18.3
5 primary · 16.7 efficiency · 4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8058
Zionsville · Zionsville, IN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
310
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Shane Mikesky quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit