Usage / Role
2%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2025-2025Tennessee
TE • 6'5" • 236 lbs • Southlake, TX, USA
Jack Van Dorselaer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
2%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
16
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
16
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
30
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Tennessee
Snapshot
Jack Van Dorselaer, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Tennessee. Jack Van Dorselaer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Tennessee | 4 | 5 | 23 | 1 | 53.1 |
Related Context
Transfer Portal History
Jack Van Dorselaer played TE for Tennessee. Across 1 tracked season, Jack Van Dorselaer recorded 23 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 23 primary output with 30.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 30.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
5.8
Efficiency
30.8
Usage
6.3
Consistency
60.6
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. East Tennessee State: 7. UAB: 5. New Mexico State: -2. Florida: 13
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Tennessee State: 1 by 46.7. UAB: 1 by 33.3. New Mexico State: 1 by 0. Florida: 2 by 43.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs East Tennessee State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Tennessee | 23 | 30.8 | 6.3 | — |
#1 Featured game
@ No. 63 Florida
Week 13 · W 31-11 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13
Receiving Yards
60.9 takeover
13 receiving yards with a 43.3 efficiency score.
#2
vs East Tennessee State
Week 2 · W 72-17
7
Receiving Yards
36.4 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#3
vs No. 125 UAB
Week 4 · W 56-24
5
Receiving Yards
30.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#4
vs No. 123 New Mexico State
Week 12 · W 42-9
-2
Receiving Yards
5.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
-2 receiving yards with a 0 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Tennessee
23 primary output · 30.8 efficiency · 6.3 usage
53.1
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.