Usage / Role
8%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2025-2025Texas A&M
DT • 6'2" • 294 lbs • Cypress, TX, USA
Landon Rink shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.2 disruption score.
Usage / Role
8%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
31
Developing production for a defensive lineman
Reliability
25
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
42
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Landon Rink, DT. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Landon Rink shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.2 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 4 | 9 | 1.5 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 44.7 |
Related Context
Landon Rink played DT for Texas A&M. Across 1 tracked season, Landon Rink recorded 9 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 1.5 primary output with 13.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 13.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
13.2
Usage
3.2
Consistency
38.9
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 1. Utah State: 0. Arkansas: 0.5. Samford: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 4 by 26.7. Utah State: 1 by 4.2. Arkansas: 1 by 9.2. Samford: 3 by 12.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
26.7 vs UTSA
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1.5 | 13.2 | 3.2 | — |
#1 Featured game
vs No. 62 UTSA
Week 1 · W 42-24
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Havoc Plays
61.7 takeover
1 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.
#2
@ No. 53 Arkansas
Week 8 · W 45-42 · Conference game
0.5
Havoc Plays
25.8 takeover
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 25.8 takeover score.
#3
vs Samford
Week 13 · W 48-0
0
Havoc Plays
11.9 takeover
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 11.9 takeover score.
#4
vs No. 79 Utah State
Week 2 · W 44-22
0
Havoc Plays
3.9 takeover
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
1.5 primary output · 13.2 efficiency · 3.2 usage
44.7
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.