Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2025-2025LSU
DJ Pickett
CB • 6'5" • 195 lbs • Zephyrhills, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
DJ Pickett shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.2
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
29.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · LSU
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DJ Pickett, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · LSU. DJ Pickett shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
DJ Pickett played CB for LSU. Across 1 tracked season, DJ Pickett recorded 35 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with LSU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
LSU paired 11 primary output with 21.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · LSU
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
21.2
Usage
6.7
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 2. Clemson: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. Florida: 1. Unknown: 0. Ole Miss: 0. South Carolina: 2. Vanderbilt: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Alabama: 0. Arkansas: 1. Western Kentucky: 3. Oklahoma: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 7 by 49.2. Clemson: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 14.2. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Ole Miss: 1 by 4.2. South Carolina: 6 by 45. Vanderbilt: 2 by 8.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3. Alabama: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas: 3 by 22.5. Western Kentucky: 6 by 55
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.3 · Games = 6 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 6 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · Games = 7 · +0.0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 6 · -0.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Best efficiency game
55 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/28 | @ Houston | L 35-38 | 7 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Oklahoma | L 13-17 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/23 | vs Western KentuckySplash game | W 13-10 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Arkansas | W 23-22 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Alabama | L 9-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Texas A&M | L 25-49 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Vanderbilt | L 24-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs South Carolina | W 20-10 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Ole Miss | L 19-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Florida | W 20-10 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 23-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Clemson | W 17-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | LSU | 11 | 21.2 | 6.7 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | LSU | 11 | 21.2 | 6.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
#2
Houston
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.9 takeover score.
#3
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
#4
Oklahoma
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.3 takeover score.
#5
Florida
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 21.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · LSU
11 primary output · 21.2 efficiency · 6.7 usage
29.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · LSU
29.3
11 primary · 21.2 efficiency · 6.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.9943
Zephyrhills · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
35
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 13 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.