Usage Score
26
Player Dossier
2011-2015Tulsa
Zack Langer
RB • 6'0" • Jenks, OK, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Zack Langer leans balanced backfield option traits and 38 efficiency.
Efficiency
38
Consistency
65.3
Season Value
57.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Tulsa
111213141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zack Langer, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Tulsa. Zack Langer leans balanced backfield option traits and 38 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 810 primary output with 43.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 38 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Tulsa
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
76.2
Efficiency
38
Usage
26
Consistency
65.3
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 63. Florida Atlantic: 123. New Mexico: 139. Oklahoma: 181. Houston: 62. UL Monroe: 69. East Carolina: 76. SMU: 35. Cincinnati: 0. Navy: 76. Tulane: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 8 by 82. Florida Atlantic: 25 by 43.7. New Mexico: 33 by 43.9. Oklahoma: 33 by 55.3. Houston: 19 by 34. UL Monroe: 28 by 25.7. East Carolina: 18 by 44. SMU: 16 by 22.8. Cincinnati: 1 by 0. Navy: 16 by 48.5. Tulane: 8 by 18.2
Split Comparison
Wins76 · n=5 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses76.3 · n=6 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half106.2 · n=6 · +66.0 vs Second Half
Second Half40.2 · n=5 · -66.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
82 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/26 | @ Virginia Tech | L 52-55 | 8 | 63 | 7.90 | 1 | — | — | 7.9 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Tulane | W 45-34 | 8 | 14 | 1.80 | 1 | — | — | 1.8 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Navy2+ TD | L 21-44 | 15 | 69 | 4.60 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4.8 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Cincinnati | L 38-49 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ SMU2+ TD | W 40-31 | 16 | 35 | 2.20 | 3 | — | — | 2.2 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ East Carolina | L 17-30 | 18 | 76 | 4.20 | 1 | — | — | 4.2 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs UL Monroe2+ TD | W 34-24 | 28 | 69 | 2.50 | 2 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Houston2+ TD | L 24-38 | 19 | 62 | 3.30 | 3 | — | — | 3.3 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oklahoma100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 38-52 | 31 | 161 | 5.20 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 5.5 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ New Mexico100 rush yards | W 40-21 | 33 | 139 | 4.20 | 1 | — | — | 4.2 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Florida Atlantic2+ TD | W 47-44 | 24 | 89 | 3.70 | 3 | 1 | 34 | 4.9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 249 | 54.5 | 11.1 | 249 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 64 | 28.8 | 3.6 | -185 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 810 | 43.4 | 31.8 | 746 |
| 2015 Postseason | Tulsa | 838 | 38 | 26 | 28 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 838 | 38 | 26 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
167
Primary metric
167 scrimmage yards and 52.4 usage.
#2
Oklahoma
181
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
181 scrimmage yards and 44.6 usage.
#3
East Carolina
37
Primary metric
Loss with 37 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
37 scrimmage yards and 8.5 usage.
#4
Houston
68
Primary metric
Win with 68 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
68 scrimmage yards and 9 usage.
#5
UTEP
81
Primary metric
Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81 scrimmage yards and 11.9 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Tulsa
810 primary output · 43.4 efficiency · 31.8 usage
60.4
#2
2015 Postseason · Tulsa
57.3
838 primary · 38 efficiency · 26 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Tulsa
57.3
838 primary · 38 efficiency · 26 usage
Milestones
7
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7794
Jenks · Jenks, OK
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,961
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.