Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2025-2025Miami
WR • 6'4" • Miami, FL, USA
Joshua Moore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
7
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
10
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
20
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Miami
Snapshot
Player Story
Joshua Moore built his college career in 2025 as a wide receiver from Miami, FL wearing No. 3, spending time with Miami. The clearest part of Joshua Moore's career was his receiving role: 17 catches, 210 receiving...
Read the storyJoshua Moore, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Miami. Joshua Moore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Miami | 10 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 53.6 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Miami | 10 | 14 | 194 | 2 | 53.6 |
Related Context
Joshua Moore played WR for Miami. Across 1 tracked season, Joshua Moore recorded 210 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Miami.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Miami paired 210 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 60.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
21
Efficiency
60.3
Usage
7.7
Consistency
28.3
Best Game by takeover score
South Florida
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 1. Ole Miss: 11. Texas A&M: 4. Notre Dame: 8. Bethune-Cookman: 7. South Florida: 61. Stanford: 38. Syracuse: 12. NC State: 56. Virginia Tech: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 1 by 6.7. Ole Miss: 1 by 73.3. Texas A&M: 1 by 26.7. Notre Dame: 2 by 26.7. Bethune-Cookman: 1 by 46.7. South Florida: 3 by 100. Stanford: 4 by 63.3. Syracuse: 1 by 80. NC State: 2 by 100. Virginia Tech: 1 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs NC State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/20 | @ Indiana | L 21-27 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Fri 1/9 | @ Ole Miss | W 31-27 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 12/20 | @ Texas A&M | W 10-3 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Virginia Tech | W 34-17 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs NC State | W 41-7 | — | 2 | 56 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Syracuse | W 38-10 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Stanford | W 42-7 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs South Florida2+ TD | W 49-12 | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 2 | 39 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Bethune-Cookman | W 45-3 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Notre Dame | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
Player Story
Joshua Moore built his college career in 2025 as a wide receiver from Miami, FL wearing No. 3, spending time with Miami. The clearest part of Joshua Moore's career was his receiving role: 17 catches, 210 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns across 10 career games in the available record. That gives Joshua Moore's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Miami
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Miami | 210 | 60.3 | 7.7 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Miami | 210 | 60.3 | 7.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs No. 29 South Florida
Week 3 · W 49-12
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61
Receiving Yards
80 takeover
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs No. 55 NC State
Week 12 · W 41-7 · Conference game
56
Receiving Yards
73.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs No. 112 Stanford
Week 9 · W 42-7 · Conference game
38
Receiving Yards
62.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
#4
vs No. 115 Syracuse
Week 11 · W 38-10 · Conference game
12
Receiving Yards
39.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
@ No. 105 Virginia Tech
Week 13 · W 34-17 · Conference game
12
Receiving Yards
37.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Miami
210 primary output · 60.3 efficiency · 7.7 usage
53.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Miami
53.6
210 primary · 60.3 efficiency · 7.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.