Usage Score
16.2
Player Dossier
2011-2015Tulsa
Conner Floyd
WR • 6'0" • Autin, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Conner Floyd reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66
Consistency
50
Season Value
58
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Tulsa
111213141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Conner Floyd, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Tulsa. Conner Floyd reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Tulsa paired 458 primary output with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Tulsa
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
35.2
Efficiency
66
Usage
16.2
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 20. Florida Atlantic: 20. New Mexico: 26. Oklahoma: 13. Houston: 52. UL Monroe: 39. East Carolina: 15. Memphis: 13. SMU: 40. UCF: 72. Cincinnati: 76. Navy: 72. Tulane: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 44.4. New Mexico: 1 by 100. Oklahoma: 2 by 43.3. Houston: 4 by 86.7. UL Monroe: 4 by 65. East Carolina: 2 by 50. Memphis: 3 by 28.9. SMU: 5 by 53.3. UCF: 3 by 100. Cincinnati: 7 by 72.4. Navy: 10 by 48
Split Comparison
Wins32.8 · n=6 · -4.5 vs Losses
Losses37.3 · n=7 · +4.5 vs Wins
First Half26.4 · n=7 · -19.1 vs Second Half
Second Half45.5 · n=6 · +19.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/26 | @ Virginia Tech | L 52-55 | — | 1 | 20 | 7.5 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Tulane | W 45-34 | — | — | — | -5 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/22 | vs NavyHigh volume | L 21-44 | — | 10 | 72 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Cincinnati | L 38-49 | — | 7 | 76 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs UCF2+ TD | W 45-30 | — | 3 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 2 | 36 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ SMU | W 40-31 | — | 5 | 40 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Memphis | L 42-66 | — | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ East Carolina | L 17-30 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs UL Monroe | W 34-24 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Houston | L 24-38 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oklahoma | L 38-52 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ New Mexico | W 40-21 | — | 1 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 47-44 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 41 | 100 | 10.5 | 41 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 91 | 63.5 | 10 | 50 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 139 | 51.6 | 8.4 | 48 |
| 2015 Postseason | Tulsa | 458 | 66 | 16.2 | 319 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 458 | 66 | 16.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCF
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
41
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oklahoma
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 72.4 efficiency score.
#5
Texas State
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Tulsa
458 primary output · 66 efficiency · 16.2 usage
58
#2
2015 Regular Season · Tulsa
58
458 primary · 66 efficiency · 16.2 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Tulsa
36.8
139 primary · 51.6 efficiency · 8.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7959
Lake Travis · Austin, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
729
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.