Usage Score
3.7
Player Dossier
2025-2025Ole Miss
DL • 6'4" • 280 lbs • Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Andrew Maddox shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.7
Efficiency
16.2
Consistency
58.1
Season Value
44.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Maddox, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Ole Miss. Andrew Maddox shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.2 disruption score.
Andrew Maddox played DL for Ole Miss. Across 1 tracked season, Andrew Maddox recorded 11 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Ole Miss.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 3.5 primary output with 16.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 16.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: The Citadel
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
16.2
Usage
3.7
Consistency
58.1
Best Game by takeover score
The Citadel
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 0. Georgia State: 0. Tulane: 1. The Citadel: 1.5. Mississippi State: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 1 by 4.2. Georgia State: 1 by 4.2. Tulane: 1 by 14.2. The Citadel: 7 by 44.2. Mississippi State: 1 by 14.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
The Citadel
Best efficiency game
44.2 vs The Citadel
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ole Miss
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Ole Miss | 3.5 | 16.2 | 3.7 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 3.5 | 16.2 | 3.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
The Citadel
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5
Primary metric
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 51.4 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28.3 takeover score.
#3
Tulane
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28 takeover score.
#4
Tulane
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#5
Georgia State
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
3.5 primary output · 16.2 efficiency · 3.7 usage
44.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Ole Miss
44.5
3.5 primary · 16.2 efficiency · 3.7 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2025 · Rating 0.9177
Oak Grove · Hattiesburg, MS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
11
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.