Usage / Role
12%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2025-2025Texas
WR • 6'2" • 185 lbs • Sachse, TX, USA
Kaliq Lockett reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
12%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
61
Solid production for a receiver
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
54
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas
Snapshot
Kaliq Lockett, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas. Kaliq Lockett reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Texas | 3 | 2 | 35 | 1 | 59.8 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 59.8 |
Related Context
Kaliq Lockett played WR for Texas. Across 1 tracked season, Kaliq Lockett recorded 47 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas paired 47 primary output with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
15.7
Efficiency
57.8
Usage
7.8
Consistency
55.6
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 35. San José State: 22. Sam Houston: -10
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 2 by 100. San José State: 2 by 73.3. Sam Houston: 1 by 0
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Texas | 47 | 57.8 | 7.8 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas | 47 | 57.8 | 7.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs No. 25 Michigan
Week 1 · W 41-27 · Postseason · Ranked opponent
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35
Receiving Yards
77.2 takeover
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs No. 118 San José State
Week 2 · W 38-7
22
Receiving Yards
56 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
vs No. 135 Sam Houston
Week 4 · W 55-0
-10
Receiving Yards
4.8 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
-10 receiving yards with a 0 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Texas
47 primary output · 57.8 efficiency · 7.8 usage
59.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas
59.8
47 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 7.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.