Usage Score
4.1
Player Dossier
2025-2025Notre Dame
Dallas Golden
CB • 6'0" • 185 lbs • Tampa, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dallas Golden shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.1
Consistency
9.5
Season Value
11.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
25
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dallas Golden, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Dallas Golden shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 3.5 primary output with 18.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 18.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Games
7
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
18.1
Usage
4.1
Consistency
9.5
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 2.5. Arkansas: 0. Boise State: 0. NC State: 0. USC: 1. Navy: 0. Stanford: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 5 by 45.8. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. Boise State: 6 by 25. NC State: 3 by 12.5. USC: 3 by 22.5. Navy: 2 by 8.3. Stanford: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.5 · n=7
First Half0.6 · n=4 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=3 · -0.3 vs First Half
All Games0.5 · n=7
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Purdue
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 3.5 | 18.1 | 4.1 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.6 takeover score.
#2
USC
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 21.6 takeover score.
#3
Boise State
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 9.7 takeover score.
#4
NC State
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 5 takeover score.
#5
Arkansas
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
3.5 primary output · 18.1 efficiency · 4.1 usage
11.7
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.953
Berkeley Prep · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
22
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 7 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.