Player Stats

Devonta Freeman College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,730
Rushing yards
2,255
Receiving yards
475
Touchdowns
31

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 PostseasonFlorida State12604812054.4
2011 Regular SeasonFlorida State1263053199854.4
2012 PostseasonFlorida State11733043061.8
2012 Regular SeasonFlorida State1167363043861.8
2013 PostseasonFlorida State14947321176.8
2013 Regular SeasonFlorida State141,2009432571476.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Florida State paired 1,294 primary output with 64.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 64.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Florida State

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

92.4

Efficiency

64.7

Usage

24.2

Consistency

73.6

Best Game by takeover score

Miami

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 94. Pittsburgh: 63. Nevada: 109. Bethune-Cookman: 112. Boston College: 49. Maryland: 98. Clemson: 95. NC State: 122. Miami: 176. Wake Forest: 10. Syracuse: 63. Idaho: 135. Florida: 55. Duke: 113

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 14 by 69.5. Pittsburgh: 11 by 60. Nevada: 9 by 100. Bethune-Cookman: 10 by 96.7. Boston College: 9 by 56.7. Maryland: 20 by 43.6. Clemson: 22 by 43. NC State: 13 by 87. Miami: 29 by 46.5. Wake Forest: 7 by 17.4. Syracuse: 5 by 95.3. Idaho: 12 by 96.9. Florida: 15 by 36.4. Duke: 19 by 56.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half88.6 · Games = 7 · -7.7 vs Second Half
Second Half96.3 · Games = 7 · +7.7 vs First Half