Usage Score
14.7
Player Dossier
2011-2015Arizona
WR • 6'4" • Palmdale, CA, USA
David Richards reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.7
Efficiency
78.9
Consistency
53.6
Season Value
61.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arizona
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Richards, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arizona. David Richards reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Arizona paired 548 primary output with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
42.2
Efficiency
78.9
Usage
14.7
Consistency
53.6
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 34. UTSA: 31. Nevada: 52. Unknown: 120. UCLA: 16. Stanford: 23. Oregon State: 61. Colorado: 49. Washington State: 6. Washington: 38. USC: 86. Utah: 23. Arizona State: 9
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 2 by 100. UTSA: 3 by 68.9. Nevada: 3 by 100. Unknown: 8 by 100. UCLA: 1 by 100. Stanford: 3 by 51.1. Oregon State: 2 by 100. Colorado: 3 by 100. Washington State: 1 by 40. Washington: 6 by 42.2. USC: 9 by 63.7. Utah: 1 by 100. Arizona State: 1 by 60
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | @ New Mexico | W 45-37 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Arizona State | L 37-52 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Utah | W 37-30 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ USCHigh volume | L 30-38 | — | 9 | 86 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Washington | L 3-49 | — | 6 | 38 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Washington State | L 42-45 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 10/18 | @ Colorado | W 38-31 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Oregon State | W 44-7 | — | 2 | 61 | 30.5 | 30.50 | 0 | 50 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ Stanford | L 17-55 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs UCLA | L 30-56 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 120 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Nevada | W 44-20 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Fri 9/4 | vs UTSA | W 42-32 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Arizona | 298 | 70.6 | 13.9 | 298 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Arizona | 298 | 70.6 | 13.9 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arizona | 148 | 65.2 | 13.7 | -150 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona | 211 | 64.7 | 10.8 | 63 |
| 2015 Postseason | Arizona | 548 | 78.9 | 14.7 | 337 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona | 548 | 78.9 | 14.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
120
Primary metric
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nevada
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 70.7 efficiency score.
#4
Colorado
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Washington
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Arizona
548 primary output · 78.9 efficiency · 14.7 usage
61.8
#2
2015 Regular Season · Arizona
61.8
548 primary · 78.9 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Arizona
52.7
298 primary · 70.6 efficiency · 13.9 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8663
Queen Creek · Queen Creek, AZ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,205
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
David Richards quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit