Player Stats

Ka'Deem Carey College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
4,918
Rushing yards
4,239
Receiving yards
679
Touchdowns
52

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonArizona11628425203846.8
2012 PostseasonArizona1318717215384.3
2012 Regular SeasonArizona132,0451,7572882184.3
2013 PostseasonArizona121691690285.6
2013 Regular SeasonArizona121,8891,7161731885.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Arizona paired 2,058 primary output with 58.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 58.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Arizona

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

171.5

Efficiency

58.2

Usage

45.3

Consistency

92.1

Best Game by takeover score

Utah

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 169. UNLV: 171. UTSA: 161. Washington: 181. USC: 174. Utah: 233. Colorado: 131. California: 152. UCLA: 151. Washington State: 177. Oregon: 201. Arizona State: 157

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 27 by 65.2. UNLV: 16 by 94.5. UTSA: 29 by 52.8. Washington: 34 by 49.7. USC: 27 by 67.9. Utah: 42 by 60.3. Colorado: 26 by 53.3. California: 32 by 49.5. UCLA: 29 by 55. Washington State: 32 by 54.8. Oregon: 49 by 43.9. Arizona State: 32 by 51.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins174 · Games = 7 · +6 vs Losses
Losses168 · Games = 5 · -6 vs Wins