Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2024-2025Miami (OH)
Josh Ringer
RB • 6'1" • 203 lbs • Lawrenceburg, IN, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Josh Ringer leans balanced backfield option traits and 33.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
33.2
Consistency
37.7
Season Value
43.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Miami (OH)
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Ringer, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Miami (OH). Josh Ringer leans balanced backfield option traits and 33.2 efficiency.
Josh Ringer played RB for Miami (OH). Across 2 tracked seasons, Josh Ringer recorded 60 rushing yards, 38 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Miami (OH).
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Miami (OH) paired 84 primary output with 33.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 33.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
8.4
Efficiency
33.2
Usage
5.2
Consistency
37.7
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 8. UNLV: 6. Unknown: 4. Eastern Michigan: 29. Western Michigan: 5. Ohio: 14. Toledo: 1. Buffalo: 2. Ball State: 5. Western Michigan: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 3 by 23.6. UNLV: 2 by 31.3. Unknown: 2 by 20.8. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 33.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 17.4. Ohio: 3 by 38.9. Toledo: 1 by 10.4. Buffalo: 1 by 20.8. Ball State: 1 by 52.1. Western Michigan: 1 by 83.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins10.3 · Games = 4 · +2.5 vs Losses
Losses7.8 · Games = 5 · -2.5 vs Wins
First Half10.4 · Games = 5 · +4 vs Second Half
Second Half6.4 · Games = 5 · -4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/6 | @ Western Michigan | L 13-23 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Ball State | W 45-24 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Thu 11/20 | @ Buffalo | W 37-20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Thu 11/13 | vs Toledo | L 3-24 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Wed 11/5 | @ Ohio | L 20-24 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 14 | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Western Michigan | W 26-17 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | — | — | 1.7 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 44-30 | 8 | 26 | 3.30 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3.2 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs UNLV | L 38-41 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-17 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami (OH)
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 14 | 16.7 | 4.8 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 14 | 16.7 | 4.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 84 | 33.2 | 5.2 | 70 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
29
Primary metric
29 scrimmage yards and 13.2 usage.
#2
Colorado State
9
Primary metric
Win with 9 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
9 scrimmage yards and 6.4 usage.
#3
Western Michigan
10
Primary metric
Loss with 10 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
10 scrimmage yards and 2.2 usage.
#4
Ohio
14
Primary metric
Loss with 14 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
14 scrimmage yards and 6.3 usage.
#5
Ball State
5
Primary metric
Win with 5 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
5 scrimmage yards and 1.9 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
84 primary output · 33.2 efficiency · 5.2 usage
43.5
#2
2024 Postseason · Miami (OH)
20.4
14 primary · 16.7 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
20.4
14 primary · 16.7 efficiency · 4.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8504
East Central · Brookville, IN
- Committed To
- Miami (OH)
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
98
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 13 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.