Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2011-2015Georgia Tech
Jamal Golden
DB • 6'0" • Wetumpka, AL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jamal Golden shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 1.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
1.7
Consistency
2.8
Season Value
12.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
11121213141415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Georgia Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: USC
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamal Golden, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Georgia Tech. Jamal Golden shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 1.7 disruption score.
Jamal Golden played DB for Georgia Tech. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jamal Golden recorded 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Georgia Tech.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Georgia Tech paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 1.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
1.7
Usage
—
Consistency
2.8
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Tulane: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Duke: 0. North Carolina: 0. Clemson: 0. Pittsburgh: 0. Florida State: 1. Virginia: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. Miami: 0. Georgia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 2 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 9 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida State
Best efficiency game
20 vs Florida State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Georgia | L 7-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Miami | L 21-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/13 | vs Virginia Tech | L 21-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Virginia | L 21-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Florida State | W 22-16 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Pittsburgh | L 28-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Clemson | L 24-43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | vs North Carolina | L 31-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Duke | L 20-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Notre Dame | L 22-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Tulane | W 65-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Tech
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220122013201420142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 3 | 4.3 | — | 3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 3 | 4.3 | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | 0 | — | -3 |
| 2014 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 4 | 5.7 | — | 4 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 4 | 5.7 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 1 | 1.7 | — | -3 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
USC
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Duke
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Clemson
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Virginia
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2014 Postseason · Georgia Tech
38.4
4 primary · 5.7 efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
38.4
4 primary · 5.7 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
8
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8117
Wetumpka · Wetumpka, AL
- Committed To
- Georgia Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
0
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.