Usage Score
20.4
Player Dossier
2011-2015Buffalo
Ron Willoughby
WR • 6'4" • Avon Lake, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ron Willoughby reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.1
Consistency
69.7
Season Value
67.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Buffalo
1112131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ron Willoughby, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Buffalo. Ron Willoughby reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 771 primary output with 87.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
67.8
Efficiency
79.1
Usage
20.4
Consistency
69.7
Best Game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 60. Penn State: 80. Florida Atlantic: 7. Nevada: 122. Bowling Green: 73. Central Michigan: 53. Ohio: 29. Miami (OH): 87. Kent State: 42. Northern Illinois: 101. Akron: 105. Massachusetts: 54
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 100. Penn State: 8 by 66.7. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 46.7. Nevada: 10 by 81.3. Bowling Green: 8 by 60.8. Central Michigan: 2 by 100. Ohio: 3 by 64.4. Miami (OH): 2 by 100. Kent State: 3 by 93.3. Northern Illinois: 6 by 100. Akron: 11 by 63.6. Massachusetts: 5 by 72
Split Comparison
Wins41.3 · n=4 · -42.8 vs Losses
Losses84 · n=7 · +42.8 vs Wins
First Half65.8 · n=6 · -3.8 vs Second Half
Second Half69.7 · n=6 · +3.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nevada
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | vs Massachusetts | L 26-31 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Akron100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-42 | — | 11 | 105 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Thu 11/12 | vs Northern Illinois100 receiving yards | L 30-41 | — | 6 | 101 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 40 |
| Fri 11/6 | @ Kent State | W 18-17 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 29 |
| Thu 10/29 | @ Miami (OH)2+ TD | W 29-24 | — | 2 | 87 | 43.5 | 43.50 | 2 | 78 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Ohio | W 41-17 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Central Michigan | L 14-51 | — | 2 | 53 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Bowling GreenHigh volume | L 22-28 | — | 8 | 73 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Nevada100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-24 | — | 10 | 122 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 33-15 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Penn StateHigh volume | L 14-27 | — | 8 | 80 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 83 | 100 | 8.9 | 83 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Buffalo | 771 | 87.3 | 22.2 | 688 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 813 | 79.1 | 20.4 | 42 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
132
Primary metric
132 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.
#2
Nevada
122
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 81.3 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Baylor
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
101
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Buffalo
771 primary output · 87.3 efficiency · 22.2 usage
67.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
67.1
813 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 20.4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Buffalo
54.1
83 primary · 100 efficiency · 8.9 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
Avon Lake · Avon Lake, OH
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,667
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.