Usage / Role
69%
Regular offensive contributor
Player Dossier
2011-2015Buffalo
QB • 6'2" • Williamsville, NY, USA
Joe Licata is a balanced quarterback profile with 9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
69%
Regular offensive contributor
Impact Production
52
Solid production for a quarterback
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
44
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
Snapshot
Player Story
Joe Licata built his college career from 2011 through 2015 as a quarterback from Williamsville, NY wearing No. 16, spending time with Buffalo. The clearest part of Joe Licata's career was his passing role: 9,485...
Read the storyJoe Licata, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Buffalo. Joe Licata is a balanced quarterback profile with 9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | Buffalo | 9 | 991 | 1,045 | -54 | 7 | 38.1 |
| 2013 Postseason | Buffalo | 13 | 181 | 196 | -15 | 3 | 61.9 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 13 | 2,579 | 2,628 | -49 | 22 | 61.9 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Buffalo | 11 | 2,641 | 2,647 | -6 | 31 | 61.1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 12 | 2,909 | 2,969 | -60 | 17 | 63.2 |
Related Context
Joe Licata played QB for Buffalo. Across 5 tracked seasons, Joe Licata recorded 9,485 passing yards, -184 rushing yards, and -9 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 2,909 primary output with 55.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 58.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with 483 yards of offense and 58.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
212.3
Efficiency
58.4
Usage
9.5
Consistency
73.3
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 181. Ohio State: 173. Baylor: 208. Stony Brook: 178. UConn: 177. Eastern Michigan: 248. Western Michigan: 130. Massachusetts: 167. Kent State: 284. Ohio: 168. Toledo: 483. Miami (OH): 172. Bowling Green: 191
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 35 by 46.1. Ohio State: 35 by 48.8. Baylor: 20 by 59.4. Stony Brook: 50 by 45.8. UConn: 19 by 69.7. Eastern Michigan: 25 by 83.3. Western Michigan: 25 by 54.1. Massachusetts: 27 by 72.7. Kent State: 32 by 60.3. Ohio: 24 by 51.2. Toledo: 62 by 58.4. Miami (OH): 32 by 64.9. Bowling Green: 50 by 44.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ San Diego State3+ TD | L 24-49 | 13 | 30 | 196 | 43.3 | 3 | 1 | 46.1 | 5 | -15 | -3 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Bowling Green | L 7-24 | 21 | 45 | 221 | 46.7 | 0 | 1 | 44.7 | 5 | -30 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed 11/20 | @ Miami (OH) | W 44-7 | 20 | 32 | 172 | 62.5 | 1 | 1 | 64.9 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/13 | @ Toledo300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 41-51 | 36 | 58 | 497 | 62.1 | 4 | 0 | 58.4 | 4 | -14 | -3.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed 11/6 | vs Ohio | W 30-3 | 13 | 22 | 169 | 59.1 | 2 | 1 | 51.2 | 2 | -1 | -0.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Kent State | W 41-21 | 20 | 31 | 285 | 64.5 | 2 | 0 | 60.3 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Massachusetts | W 32-3 | 18 | 27 | 167 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 72.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Western Michigan3+ TD | W 33-0 | 11 | 21 | 124 | 52.4 | 3 | 0 | 54.1 | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 42-14 | 15 | 22 | 224 | 68.2 | 1 | 0 | 83.3 | 3 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs UConn3+ TD | W 41-12 | 10 | 19 | 177 | 52.6 | 3 | 1 | 69.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Stony Brook | W 26-23 | 27 | 47 | 193 | 57.4 | 1 | 1 | 45.8 | 3 | -15 | -5 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Baylor | L 13-70 | 10 | 16 | 214 | 62.5 | 1 | 1 | 59.4 | 4 | -6 | -1.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Ohio State | L 20-40 | 19 | 32 | 185 | 59.4 | 2 | 1 | 48.8 | 3 | -12 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
Player Story
Joe Licata built his college career from 2011 through 2015 as a quarterback from Williamsville, NY wearing No. 16, spending time with Buffalo. The clearest part of Joe Licata's career was his passing role: 9,485 passing yards, 76 touchdown passes, and 1,359 attempts across 45 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2014 with Buffalo. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. With 45 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Buffalo.
The arc is straightforward: Joe Licata moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Buffalo | 991 | 51 | 9.5 | 991 |
| 2013 Postseason | Buffalo | 2,760 | 58.4 | 9.5 | 1,769 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2,760 | 58.4 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2,641 | 57.2 | 8.7 | -119 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2,909 | 55.3 | 9 | 268 |
#1 Featured game
@ Akron
Week 12 · L 21-42 · Conference game
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
262
Total Offense
67.8 takeover
262 total offense with 63.3 efficiency.
#2
@ Eastern Michigan
Week 7 · L 27-37 · Conference game
400
Total Offense
67.1 takeover
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
400 total offense with 60 efficiency.
#3
@ Toledo
Week 12 · L 41-51 · Conference game
483
Total Offense
62.7 takeover
Loss with 483 yards of offense and 58.4 efficiency.
483 total offense with 58.4 efficiency.
#4
vs Bowling Green
Week 5 · L 22-28 · Conference game
362
Total Offense
62.5 takeover
Loss with 362 yards of offense and 57.4 efficiency.
362 total offense with 57.4 efficiency.
#5
vs Western Michigan
Week 11 · W 29-24 · Conference game
266
Total Offense
61 takeover
Win with 266 yards of offense and 58.9 efficiency.
266 total offense with 58.9 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
2,909 primary output · 55.3 efficiency · 9 usage
63.2
#2
2013 Postseason · Buffalo
61.9
2,760 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 9.5 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Buffalo
61.9
2,760 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 9.5 usage
14
250+ passing yards
6
300+ total offense
10
3+ TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.