Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2011-2015Buffalo
QB • 6'2" • Williamsville, NY, USA
Joe Licata is a balanced quarterback profile with 9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
9
Efficiency
55.3
Consistency
77.7
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joe Licata, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Buffalo. Joe Licata is a balanced quarterback profile with 9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Joe Licata played QB for Buffalo. Across 5 tracked seasons, Joe Licata recorded 9,485 passing yards, -184 rushing yards, and -9 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 2,909 primary output with 55.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 55.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 58.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
242.4
Efficiency
55.3
Usage
9
Consistency
77.7
Best Game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 255. Penn State: 158. Florida Atlantic: 99. Nevada: 331. Bowling Green: 362. Central Michigan: 130. Ohio: 223. Miami (OH): 285. Kent State: 182. Northern Illinois: 336. Akron: 262. Massachusetts: 286
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 28 by 75.2. Penn State: 41 by 51.5. Florida Atlantic: 21 by 43.4. Nevada: 50 by 51.2. Bowling Green: 64 by 57.4. Central Michigan: 27 by 45.1. Ohio: 34 by 69. Miami (OH): 30 by 61.3. Kent State: 44 by 48.6. Northern Illinois: 50 by 50.8. Akron: 51 by 63.3. Massachusetts: 42 by 46.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
75.2 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | vs Massachusetts | L 26-31 | 19 | 40 | 287 | 47.5 | 1 | 2 | 46.8 | 2 | -1 | -0.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Akron | L 21-42 | 32 | 51 | 262 | 62.7 | 1 | 2 | 63.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 11/12 | vs Northern Illinois300-yard game | L 30-41 | 31 | 47 | 354 | 66.0 | 2 | 3 | 50.8 | 3 | -18 | -6 | 0 | 1 |
| Fri 11/6 | @ Kent State | W 18-17 | 25 | 39 | 190 | 64.1 | 2 | 1 | 48.6 | 5 | -8 | -1.60 | 0 | 3 |
| Thu 10/29 | @ Miami (OH) | W 29-24 | 22 | 29 | 289 | 75.9 | 2 | 1 | 61.3 | 1 | -4 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Ohio | W 41-17 | 21 | 32 | 212 | 65.6 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 2 | 11 | 5.50 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Central Michigan | L 14-51 | 13 | 25 | 133 | 52.0 | 1 | 1 | 45.1 | 2 | -3 | -1.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Bowling Green300-yard game | L 22-28 | 35 | 59 | 348 | 59.3 | 1 | 1 | 57.4 | 5 | 14 | 2.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Nevada300-yard game | L 21-24 | 28 | 46 | 338 | 60.9 | 2 | 2 | 51.2 | 4 | -7 | -1.80 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 33-15 | 10 | 20 | 105 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 43.4 | 1 | -6 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Penn State | L 14-27 | 24 | 35 | 205 | 68.6 | 2 | 1 | 51.5 | 6 | -47 | -7.80 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | 20 | 26 | 246 | 76.9 | 2 | 0 | 75.2 | 2 | 9 | 4.50 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Buffalo | 991 | 51 | 9.5 | 991 |
| 2013 Postseason | Buffalo | 2,760 | 58.4 | 9.5 | 1,769 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2,760 | 58.4 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2,641 | 57.2 | 8.7 | -119 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2,909 | 55.3 | 9 | 268 |
#1 Featured game
Akron
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
262
Primary metric
262 total offense with 63.3 efficiency.
#2
Eastern Michigan
400
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
400 total offense with 60 efficiency.
#3
Toledo
483
Primary metric
Loss with 483 yards of offense and 58.4 efficiency.
483 total offense with 58.4 efficiency.
#4
Army
407
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
407 total offense with 68.2 efficiency.
#5
Bowling Green
362
Primary metric
Loss with 362 yards of offense and 57.4 efficiency.
362 total offense with 57.4 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
2,909 primary output · 55.3 efficiency · 9 usage
60.3
#2
2013 Postseason · Buffalo
58.9
2,760 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 9.5 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Buffalo
58.9
2,760 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 9.5 usage
15
250+ passing yards
6
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7683
Williamsville South · Buffalo, NY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
9,301
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.