Player Stats

Duke Watson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
864
Rushing yards
755
Receiving yards
109
Touchdowns
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2024 PostseasonLouisville1284831063.8
2024 Regular SeasonLouisville1257351459863.8
2025 Regular SeasonLouisville720715849245

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Louisville paired 657 primary output with 68.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 36.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh

Win with 50 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Louisville

Games

7

Scrimmage Yards / G

29.6

Efficiency

36.7

Usage

15.2

Consistency

68.6

Best Game by takeover score

Pittsburgh

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Eastern Kentucky: 32. James Madison: 13. Pittsburgh: 50. Virginia: 8. California: 19. Clemson: 43. SMU: 42

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Kentucky: 3 by 50.7. James Madison: 7 by 19.3. Pittsburgh: 15 by 34.9. Virginia: 2 by 29.2. California: 8 by 24.7. Clemson: 13 by 35.9. SMU: 7 by 62.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins31.7 · Games = 3 · +3.7 vs Losses
Losses28 · Games = 4 · -3.7 vs Wins