Usage Score
15.1
Player Dossier
2011-2015Bowling Green
Ryan Burbrink
WR • 5'8" • Shady Side, MD, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ryan Burbrink reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.5
Consistency
62.6
Season Value
59
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Bowling Green
1112121313141415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryan Burbrink, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Bowling Green. Ryan Burbrink reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 758 primary output with 77.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
48.2
Efficiency
72.5
Usage
15.1
Consistency
62.6
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 70. Maryland: 39. Memphis: 77. Purdue: 30. Buffalo: 68. Massachusetts: 65. Akron: 54. Kent State: 89. Ohio: 35. Western Michigan: 36. Toledo: 28. Ball State: 17. Northern Illinois: 19
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 4 by 100. Maryland: 4 by 65. Memphis: 8 by 64.2. Purdue: 4 by 50. Buffalo: 4 by 100. Massachusetts: 4 by 100. Akron: 4 by 90. Kent State: 8 by 74.2. Ohio: 3 by 77.8. Western Michigan: 5 by 48. Toledo: 2 by 93.3. Ball State: 3 by 37.8. Northern Illinois: 3 by 42.2
Split Comparison
Wins45.2 · n=10 · -13.1 vs Losses
Losses58.3 · n=3 · +13.1 vs Wins
First Half57.6 · n=7 · +20.2 vs Second Half
Second Half37.3 · n=6 · -20.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/5 | @ Northern Illinois | W 34-14 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Wed 11/25 | @ Ball State | W 48-10 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Tue 11/17 | vs Toledo | L 28-44 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 17 |
| Thu 11/12 | @ Western Michigan | W 41-27 | — | 5 | 36 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 11/5 | vs Ohio | W 62-24 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Kent StateHigh volume | W 48-0 | — | 8 | 89 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Akron | W 59-10 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Massachusetts | W 62-38 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Buffalo | W 28-22 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Purdue | W 35-28 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs MemphisHigh volume | L 41-44 | — | 8 | 77 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Maryland | W 48-27 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Tennessee | L 30-59 | — | 4 | 70 | 15.4 | 17.50 | 0 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201220132013201420142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Bowling Green | 351 | 64.6 | 17.7 | 351 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 351 | 64.6 | 17.7 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Bowling Green | 477 | 78.8 | 12.7 | 126 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 477 | 78.8 | 12.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Bowling Green | 758 | 77.2 | 21.2 | 281 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 758 | 77.2 | 21.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 627 | 72.5 | 15.1 | -131 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 92.5 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Massachusetts
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 74.2 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
71
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 67.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Bowling Green
758 primary output · 77.2 efficiency · 21.2 usage
64
#2
2014 Regular Season · Bowling Green
64
758 primary · 77.2 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Bowling Green
59
627 primary · 72.5 efficiency · 15.1 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,213
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.