Player Stats

Robby Anderson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,730
Receptions
114
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonTemple1044791974.6
2014 Regular SeasonTemple0-00-
2015 PostseasonTemple14666085.4
2015 Regular SeasonTemple1464873785.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Temple paired 939 primary output with 79.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 79.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Temple

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

67.1

Efficiency

79.2

Usage

28.4

Consistency

68.1

Best Game by takeover score

East Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 66. Penn State: 20. Cincinnati: 23. Massachusetts: 69. Charlotte: 35. Tulane: 73. UCF: 42. East Carolina: 126. Notre Dame: 53. SMU: 83. South Florida: 77. Memphis: 80. UConn: 42. Houston: 150

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 6 by 73.3. Penn State: 5 by 26.7. Cincinnati: 5 by 30.7. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. Charlotte: 3 by 77.8. Tulane: 4 by 100. UCF: 4 by 70. East Carolina: 8 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. SMU: 4 by 100. South Florida: 4 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 100. UConn: 6 by 46.7. Houston: 12 by 83.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins59.3 · Games = 10 · -27.2 vs Losses
Losses86.5 · Games = 4 · +27.2 vs Wins