Usage Score
25.3
Player Dossier
2011-2014Temple
Jalen Fitzpatrick
WR • 5'11" • Harrisburg, PA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jalen Fitzpatrick reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.7
Consistency
67.1
Season Value
66.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Temple
11121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jalen Fitzpatrick, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Temple. Jalen Fitzpatrick reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Temple paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Temple
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
60.8
Efficiency
74.7
Usage
25.3
Consistency
67.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 46. Navy: 59. Unknown: 75. UConn: 108. Tulsa: 107. Houston: 22. UCF: 15. East Carolina: 16. Memphis: 64. Penn State: 113. Cincinnati: 77. Tulane: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 5 by 61.3. Navy: 5 by 78.7. Unknown: 3 by 100. UConn: 6 by 100. Tulsa: 5 by 100. Houston: 2 by 73.3. UCF: 4 by 25. East Carolina: 2 by 53.3. Memphis: 5 by 85.3. Penn State: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 9 by 57. Tulane: 3 by 62.2
Split Comparison
Wins61 · n=5 · +2.7 vs Losses
Losses58.3 · n=6 · -2.7 vs Wins
First Half69.5 · n=6 · +17.3 vs Second Half
Second Half52.2 · n=6 · -17.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/7 | @ Tulane | W 10-3 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs CincinnatiHigh volume | L 6-14 | — | 9 | 77 | 6.5 | 8.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Penn State100 receiving yards | L 13-30 | — | 4 | 113 | 28.3 | 28.30 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Memphis | L 13-16 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs East Carolina | W 20-10 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ UCF | L 14-34 | — | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 3.80 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Houston | L 10-31 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards | W 35-24 | — | 5 | 107 | 21.4 | 21.40 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ UConn100 receiving yards | W 36-10 | — | 6 | 108 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Navy | L 24-31 | — | 5 | 59 | 10.2 | 11.80 | 1 | 30 |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Vanderbilt | W 37-7 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 1 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Temple | 363 | 79.2 | 30.7 | 363 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Temple | 429 | 60.2 | 17.3 | 66 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Temple | 730 | 74.7 | 25.3 | 301 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128
Primary metric
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Maryland
64
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UConn
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Penn State
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Temple
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2014 Regular Season · Temple
66.4
730 primary · 74.7 efficiency · 25.3 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Temple
59
363 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 30.7 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7519
Harrisburg · Harrisburg, PA
- Committed To
- Temple
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,522
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.