Usage Score
9.6
Player Dossier
2011-2015Toledo
Kishon Wilcher
WR • 5'7" • Detroit, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Kishon Wilcher reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
62.1
Consistency
59.8
Season Value
44.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Toledo
111213141415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kishon Wilcher, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Toledo. Kishon Wilcher reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Toledo paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 62.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Toledo
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
15.6
Efficiency
62.1
Usage
9.6
Consistency
59.8
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 25. Iowa State: 16. Ball State: 4. Kent State: 14. Massachusetts: 19. Northern Illinois: 6. Central Michigan: 41. Bowling Green: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 1 by 100. Iowa State: 2 by 53.3. Ball State: 1 by 26.7. Kent State: 2 by 46.7. Massachusetts: 1 by 100. Northern Illinois: 1 by 40. Central Michigan: 4 by 68.3
Split Comparison
Wins17 · n=7
First Half14.8 · n=4 · -1.8 vs Second Half
Second Half16.5 · n=4 · +1.8 vs First Half
All Games15.6 · n=8
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 11/17 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/11 | @ Central Michigan | W 28-23 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Wed 11/4 | vs Northern Illinois | L 27-32 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Massachusetts | W 51-35 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Kent State | W 38-7 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Ball State | W 24-10 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Iowa State | W 30-23 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Arkansas | W 16-12 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122013201420142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Toledo | 275 | 74.1 | 10.6 | 275 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 275 | 74.1 | 10.6 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 125 | 62.1 | 9.6 | -150 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89
Primary metric
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Central Michigan
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 68.3 efficiency score.
#3
Kent State
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Toledo
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2014 Postseason · Toledo
55.3
275 primary · 74.1 efficiency · 10.6 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Toledo
55.3
275 primary · 74.1 efficiency · 10.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7667
Cass Technical · Detroit, MI
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
400
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.