Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
USC paired 3,674 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Cody Kessler College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 9,914
- Passing yards
- 10,339
- Touchdowns
- 95
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | USC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | USC | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 59.8 |
| 2013 Postseason | USC | 14 | 347 | 345 | 2 | 4 | 57.5 |
| 2013 Regular Season | USC | 14 | 2,497 | 2,623 | -126 | 17 | 57.5 |
| 2014 Postseason | USC | 13 | 318 | 321 | -3 | 3 | 66.6 |
| 2014 Regular Season | USC | 13 | 3,356 | 3,505 | -149 | 38 | 66.6 |
| 2015 Postseason | USC | 14 | 204 | 221 | -17 | 1 | 63.2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 14 | 3,183 | 3,315 | -132 | 32 | 63.2 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 59 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Idaho
Win with 413 yards of offense and 78.5 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · USC
Games
14
Primary Metric / G
241.9
Efficiency
59
Usage
12.2
Consistency
74.6
Best Game by takeover score
Idaho
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 204. Arkansas State: 205. Idaho: 413. Stanford: 283. Arizona State: 381. Washington: 131. Notre Dame: 361. Utah: 239. California: 195. Arizona: 212. Colorado: 190. Oregon: 220. UCLA: 174. Stanford: 179
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 37 by 50.3. Arkansas State: 31 by 62.5. Idaho: 32 by 78.5. Stanford: 34 by 76. Arizona State: 36 by 65. Washington: 34 by 43.1. Notre Dame: 51 by 53.5. Utah: 33 by 63.4. California: 27 by 67.6. Arizona: 40 by 54.3. Colorado: 29 by 52.8. Oregon: 48 by 55.4. UCLA: 31 by 53.4. Stanford: 44 by 50.4
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins251.1 · Games = 8 · +21.5 vs Losses
Losses229.7 · Games = 6 · -21.5 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Cody Kessler
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.