Usage Score
14.5
Player Dossier
2011-2015South Alabama
Marvin Shinn
WR • 6'2" • Mobile, AL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Marvin Shinn reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.6
Consistency
57.8
Season Value
64.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · South Alabama
1112121415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Alabama • South Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marvin Shinn, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · South Alabama. Marvin Shinn reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Marvin Shinn played WR for Alabama and South Alabama. Across 4 tracked seasons, Marvin Shinn recorded 550 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with South Alabama.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
South Alabama paired 335 primary output with 85.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, South Alabama.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · South Alabama
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
41.9
Efficiency
85.6
Usage
14.5
Consistency
57.8
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 27. NC State: 44. Arkansas State: 58. Texas State: 94. Idaho: 26. Louisiana: 38. Georgia State: 24. App State: 24
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 3 by 60. NC State: 2 by 100. Arkansas State: 2 by 100. Texas State: 3 by 100. Idaho: 2 by 86.7. Louisiana: 3 by 84.4. Georgia State: 1 by 100. App State: 3 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins32 · Games = 2 · -13.2 vs Losses
Losses45.2 · Games = 6 · +13.2 vs Wins
First Half55.8 · Games = 4 · +27.8 vs Second Half
Second Half28 · Games = 4 · -27.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/6 | vs App State | L 27-34 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Georgia State | L 10-24 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Fri 11/13 | vs Louisiana | W 32-25 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Idaho | W 52-45 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Texas State | L 18-36 | — | 3 | 94 | 31.3 | 31.30 | 0 | 43 |
| Wed 10/14 | vs Arkansas State | L 31-49 | — | 2 | 58 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 42 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs NC State | L 13-63 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 36 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ Nebraska | L 9-48 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2011-2012
Opening stop
- 2
South Alabama
2014-2015
Final stop
Season Progression
20112012201220142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Alabama | 42 | 46.7 | 8.3 | 42 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Alabama | 42 | 46.7 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | South Alabama | 173 | 94.7 | 8.1 | 131 |
| 2015 Regular Season | South Alabama | 335 | 85.6 | 14.5 | 162 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94
Primary metric
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
13
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas State
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · South Alabama
335 primary output · 85.6 efficiency · 14.5 usage
64.3
#2
2014 Regular Season · South Alabama
55.7
173 primary · 94.7 efficiency · 8.1 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Alabama
34.8
42 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 8.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9675
Vigor · Mobile, AL
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
550
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.