Player Stats

Marvin Hall College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
409
Receptions
25
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonWashington0-00-
2012 Regular SeasonWashington6221026.8
2013 Regular SeasonWashington78140054.7
2014 PostseasonWashington823029.6
2014 Regular SeasonWashington8439129.6
2015 PostseasonWashington6444064.1
2015 Regular SeasonWashington65162264.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Washington paired 206 primary output with 80 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 80 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Sacramento State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Washington

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

34.3

Efficiency

80

Usage

8.7

Consistency

47.7

Best Game by takeover score

Sacramento State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 44. Sacramento State: 78. USC: 0. Arizona: 11. Arizona State: 65. Washington State: 8

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 4 by 73.3. Sacramento State: 1 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 73.3. Arizona State: 2 by 100. Washington State: 1 by 53.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins28.2 · Games = 5 · -36.8 vs Losses
Losses65 · Games = 1 · +36.8 vs Wins