Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2011-2015Indiana
Michael Hunter
CB • 6'0" • Monroe, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Michael Hunter shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20 disruption score.
Efficiency
20
Consistency
100
Season Value
73.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Indiana
1112131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Indiana • Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Hunter, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Indiana. Michael Hunter shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Indiana paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Indiana, Oklahoma State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
Games
2
Havoc Plays / G
1
Efficiency
20
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
12
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 1. Texas Tech: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins1 · n=2
All Games1 · n=2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
20 vs Texas Tech
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Indiana
2011-2014
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma State
2015
Final stop
Season Progression
20112012201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Indiana | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Indiana | 1 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 2 | 20 | — | 1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Purdue
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Texas Tech
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Kansas State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Indiana
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
73.3
#2
2014 Regular Season · Indiana
73.3
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
73.3
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8317
West Monroe · West Monroe, LA
- Committed To
- Indiana
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
0
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.