Player Stats

Bronson Hill College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,776
Rushing yards
2,243
Receiving yards
533
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan00000-
2012 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan101,113905208769.2
2013 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan111,2761,101175678
2014 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan11387237150241.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Eastern Michigan paired 1,276 primary output with 53.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 44.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan

Loss with 105 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

35.2

Efficiency

44.1

Usage

13.6

Consistency

53

Best Game by takeover score

Western Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida: 0. Old Dominion: 85. Michigan State: 12. Akron: 34. Buffalo: 6. Massachusetts: 38. Northern Illinois: 11. Central Michigan: 7. Western Michigan: 105. Ball State: 39. Toledo: 50

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 7 by 0. Old Dominion: 18 by 50.1. Michigan State: 6 by 17.1. Akron: 9 by 39.4. Buffalo: 1 by 62.5. Massachusetts: 2 by 75. Northern Illinois: 4 by 30.2. Central Michigan: 4 by 18.2. Western Michigan: 9 by 71.3. Ball State: 7 by 36.8. Toledo: 6 by 84.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins6 · Games = 1 · -32.1 vs Losses
Losses38.1 · Games = 10 · +32.1 vs Wins