Usage Score
9.6
Player Dossier
2011-2014Central Michigan
WR • 6'1" • Melvindale, MI, USA
Courtney Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.6
Efficiency
70.4
Consistency
32.2
Season Value
39.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Courtney Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Courtney Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Courtney Williams played WR for Central Michigan. Across 4 tracked seasons, Courtney Williams recorded -3 rushing yards, 1,082 receiving yards, and 12 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 385 primary output with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
18.6
Efficiency
70.4
Usage
9.6
Consistency
32.2
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 70. Unknown: 46. Purdue: 15. Syracuse: 5. Kansas: 5. Northern Illinois: 24. Ball State: 7. Buffalo: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Western Michigan: 14
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 3 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 76.7. Purdue: 1 by 100. Syracuse: 1 by 33.3. Kansas: 1 by 33.3. Northern Illinois: 2 by 80. Ball State: 1 by 46.7. Western Michigan: 1 by 93.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/24 | @ Western Kentucky2+ TD | L 48-49 | — | 3 | 70 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Western Michigan | L 20-32 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Miami (OH) | W 34-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Buffalo | W 20-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Ball State | L 29-32 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Northern Illinois | W 34-17 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Kansas | L 10-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Syracuse | L 3-40 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Purdue | W 38-17 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 26 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 385 | 80.9 | 15.3 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 260 | 67.5 | 11.7 | -125 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 251 | 71 | 13.3 | -9 |
| 2014 Postseason | Central Michigan | 186 | 70.4 | 9.6 | -65 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 186 | 70.4 | 9.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
133
Primary metric
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
49
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Kentucky
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UNLV
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Central Michigan
385 primary output · 80.9 efficiency · 15.3 usage
65.2
#2
2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
51.2
251 primary · 71 efficiency · 13.3 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Central Michigan
49.4
260 primary · 67.5 efficiency · 11.7 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
Melvindale · Melvindale, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,082
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.