Usage Score
13.9
Player Profile
Jesse Kroll
WR • 6'3" • Algoma, WI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jesse Kroll reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.3
Consistency
72.1
Season Value
49.4
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Central Michigan
111212131414151516
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Primary stop by seasons
- Central Michigan
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Central Michigan
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Jesse Kroll, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Central Michigan. Jesse Kroll reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 866 primary output with 78.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
53.5
Efficiency
88.3
Usage
13.9
Consistency
72.1
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 53. Oklahoma State: 98. UNLV: 54. Virginia: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 100. Oklahoma State: 7 by 93.3. UNLV: 2 by 100. Virginia: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins76 · n=2
First Half75.5 · n=2 · +44 vs Second Half
Second Half31.5 · n=2 · -44 vs First Half
All Games53.5 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs UNLV
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2011-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122012201320142014201520152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Central Michigan | 23 | 76.7 | 4.8 | 23 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 23 | 76.7 | 4.8 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 85 | 100 | 11.5 | 62 |
| 2014 Postseason | Central Michigan | 582 | 80.1 | 16.7 | 497 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 582 | 80.1 | 16.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Central Michigan | 866 | 78.1 | 19.4 | 284 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 866 | 78.1 | 19.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 214 | 88.3 | 13.9 | -652 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139
Primary metric
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Buffalo
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma State
98
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
130
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Central Michigan
866 primary output · 78.1 efficiency · 19.4 usage
63.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · Central Michigan
63.4
866 primary · 78.1 efficiency · 19.4 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Central Michigan
55.7
582 primary · 80.1 efficiency · 16.7 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
Algoma · Algoma, WI
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,770
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.