Usage Score
17
Player Dossier
2011-2014Central Michigan
WR • 6'0" • Miramar, FL, USA
Andrew Flory reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17
Efficiency
69.1
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
59.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Flory, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Central Michigan. Andrew Flory reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 340 primary output with 96.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 69.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
32
Efficiency
69.1
Usage
17
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 86. Unknown: 32. UNLV: 11. Toledo: 35. NC State: 9. Miami (OH): 4. Ohio: 21. Northern Illinois: 81. Ball State: 39. Western Michigan: 4. Massachusetts: 39. Eastern Michigan: 23
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 5 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 53.3. UNLV: 2 by 36.7. Toledo: 2 by 100. NC State: 1 by 60. Miami (OH): 1 by 26.7. Ohio: 1 by 100. Northern Illinois: 5 by 100. Ball State: 5 by 52. Western Michigan: 2 by 13.3. Massachusetts: 3 by 86.7. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 42-10 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Massachusetts | W 37-0 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Western Michigan | W 27-22 | — | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Thu 11/7 | @ Ball State | L 24-44 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Northern Illinois | L 17-38 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Ohio | W 26-23 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Miami (OH) | W 21-9 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ NC State | L 14-48 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Toledo | L 17-38 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ UNLV | L 21-31 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Michigan | L 9-59 | — | 5 | 86 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 0 | 43 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Central Michigan | 340 | 96.8 | 19 | 340 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 340 | 96.8 | 19 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 384 | 69.1 | 17 | 44 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | -384 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86
Primary metric
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 87.4 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Central Michigan
340 primary output · 96.8 efficiency · 19 usage
67.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · Central Michigan
67.2
340 primary · 96.8 efficiency · 19 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
59.2
384 primary · 69.1 efficiency · 17 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
American Heritage · Fort Lauderdale, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
724
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Andrew Flory quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit