Usage Score
31.8
Player Dossier
2011-2014Central Michigan
Titus Davis
WR • 6'2" • Wheaton, IL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Titus Davis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
91.9
Consistency
74
Season Value
70
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
1112131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Titus Davis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Titus Davis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 1,109 primary output with 92.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 91.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
98
Efficiency
91.9
Usage
31.8
Consistency
74
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 137. Unknown: 11. Toledo: 128. Ohio: 181. Northern Illinois: 54. Ball State: 128. Buffalo: 100. Eastern Michigan: 51. Miami (OH): 102. Western Michigan: 88
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 6 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 73.3. Toledo: 6 by 100. Ohio: 10 by 100. Northern Illinois: 4 by 90. Ball State: 10 by 85.3. Buffalo: 6 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 85. Miami (OH): 8 by 85. Western Michigan: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins97.6 · n=5 · -22.7 vs Losses
Losses120.3 · n=4 · +22.7 vs Wins
First Half102.2 · n=5 · +8.4 vs Second Half
Second Half93.8 · n=5 · -8.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/24 | @ Western Kentucky100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 48-49 | — | 6 | 137 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 4 | 45 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Western Michigan | L 20-32 | — | 5 | 88 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-27 | — | 8 | 102 | 13 | 12.80 | 3 | 28 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 38-7 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards | W 20-14 | — | 6 | 100 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 29-32 | — | 10 | 128 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 2 | 31 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Northern Illinois | W 34-17 | — | 4 | 54 | 11.2 | 13.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | W 28-10 | — | 10 | 181 | 18.1 | 18.10 | 2 | 53 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Toledo100 receiving yards | L 28-42 | — | 6 | 128 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 40 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 751 | 94.6 | 16.9 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 860 | 90.3 | 19.7 | 109 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1,109 | 92.7 | 34.7 | 249 |
| 2014 Postseason | Central Michigan | 980 | 91.9 | 31.8 | -129 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 980 | 91.9 | 31.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
181
Primary metric
181 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ball State
187
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
187 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kent State
192
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
192 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
208
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
208 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
154
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
1,109 primary output · 92.7 efficiency · 34.7 usage
71.6
#2
2014 Postseason · Central Michigan
70
980 primary · 91.9 efficiency · 31.8 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Central Michigan
70
980 primary · 91.9 efficiency · 31.8 usage
Milestones
17
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
11
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
Wheaton Warrenville South · Wheaton, IL
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,700
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.