Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2011-2014USC
WR • 6'1" • Los Angeles, CA, USA
George Farmer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.6
Efficiency
65.8
Consistency
43.4
Season Value
54.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · USC
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
George Farmer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · USC. George Farmer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
George Farmer played WR for USC. Across 4 tracked seasons, George Farmer recorded 17 rushing yards, 363 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with USC.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
USC paired 314 primary output with 65.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
31.4
Efficiency
65.8
Usage
10.6
Consistency
43.4
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 4. Fresno State: 20. Stanford: 36. Boston College: 16. Oregon State: 17. Arizona State: 14. Washington State: 61. California: 40. UCLA: 21. Notre Dame: 85
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 1 by 26.7. Fresno State: 3 by 44.4. Stanford: 4 by 60. Boston College: 2 by 53.3. Oregon State: 2 by 56.7. Arizona State: 2 by 46.7. Washington State: 3 by 100. California: 2 by 100. UCLA: 2 by 70. Notre Dame: 4 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/28 | vs Nebraska | W 45-42 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Notre Dame2+ TD | W 49-14 | — | 4 | 85 | 17.8 | 21.30 | 2 | 48 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ UCLA | L 20-38 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 11/14 | vs California | W 38-30 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Washington State | W 44-17 | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Arizona State | L 34-38 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/28 | vs Oregon State | W 35-10 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Boston College | L 31-37 | — | 2 | 16 | 4.7 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Stanford | W 13-10 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Fresno State | W 52-13 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
USC
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | USC | 42 | 70 | 4.1 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | USC | 7 | 46.7 | 3.8 | -35 |
| 2013 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | -7 |
| 2014 Postseason | USC | 314 | 65.8 | 10.6 | 314 |
| 2014 Regular Season | USC | 314 | 65.8 | 10.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
California
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Washington State
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
California
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · USC
314 primary output · 65.8 efficiency · 10.6 usage
54.7
#2
2014 Regular Season · USC
54.7
314 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 10.6 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · USC
41.7
42 primary · 70 efficiency · 4.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9953
Junipero Serra · Gardena, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
363
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.