Usage Score
30.3
Player Dossier
2011-2013Clemson
WR • 6'1" • Fort Myers, FL, USA
Sammy Watkins reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
30.3
Efficiency
82.7
Consistency
74.7
Season Value
71.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sammy Watkins, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Clemson. Sammy Watkins reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Sammy Watkins played WR for Clemson. Across 3 tracked seasons, Sammy Watkins recorded 61 passing yards, 339 rushing yards, and 3,391 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Clemson paired 1,464 primary output with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
112.6
Efficiency
82.7
Usage
30.3
Consistency
74.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 227. Georgia: 127. Unknown: 19. NC State: 96. Wake Forest: 113. Syracuse: 126. Boston College: 101. Florida State: 68. Maryland: 163. Virginia: 169. Georgia Tech: 104. Unknown: 58. South Carolina: 93
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 16 by 94.6. Georgia: 6 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 42.2. NC State: 10 by 64. Wake Forest: 6 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Boston College: 7 by 96.2. Florida State: 8 by 56.7. Maryland: 14 by 77.6. Virginia: 8 by 100. Georgia Tech: 5 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 55.2. South Carolina: 7 by 88.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/4 | @ Ohio State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 40-35 | — | 16 | 227 | 13.5 | 14.20 | 2 | 34 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ South Carolina | L 17-31 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 57 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 58 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Fri 11/15 | vs Georgia Tech100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 55-31 | — | 5 | 104 | 17.3 | 20.80 | 2 | 44 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Virginia100 receiving yards · High volume | W 59-10 | — | 8 | 169 | 21.1 | 21.10 | 2 | 96 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Maryland100 receiving yards · High volume | W 40-27 | — | 14 | 163 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Florida StateHigh volume | L 14-51 | — | 8 | 68 | 7.9 | 8.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Boston College100 receiving yards | W 24-14 | — | 7 | 101 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Syracuse100 receiving yards | W 49-14 | — | 4 | 126 | 31.5 | 31.50 | 1 | 91 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Wake Forest100 receiving yards | W 56-7 | — | 6 | 113 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 1 | 64 |
| Thu 9/19 | @ NC StateHigh volume | W 26-14 | — | 10 | 96 | 9 | 9.60 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Georgia100 receiving yards | W 38-35 | — | 6 | 127 | 16.1 | 21.20 | 1 | 77 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Clemson | 1,219 | 88.8 | 28.7 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,219 | 88.8 | 28.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Clemson | 708 | 73.2 | 31.2 | -511 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Clemson | 708 | 73.2 | 31.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Clemson | 1,464 | 82.7 | 30.3 | 756 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,464 | 82.7 | 30.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
227
Primary metric
227 receiving yards with a 94.6 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia Tech
153
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Auburn
155
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Boston College
152
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
202
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
202 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Clemson
1,464 primary output · 82.7 efficiency · 30.3 usage
71.9
#2
2013 Regular Season · Clemson
71.9
1,464 primary · 82.7 efficiency · 30.3 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Clemson
68
1,219 primary · 88.8 efficiency · 28.7 usage
15
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9906
South Fort Myers · Fort Myers, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,391
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.