Player Stats

Christian Clark College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
293
Rushing yards
236
Receiving yards
57
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2024 Regular SeasonTexas00000-
2025 PostseasonTexas81051050150.2
2025 Regular SeasonTexas818813157150.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Texas paired 293 primary output with 34.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 34.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Texas

Games

8

Scrimmage Yards / G

36.6

Efficiency

34.8

Usage

13.3

Consistency

28

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 105. San José State: 21. UTEP: 64. Sam Houston: 78. Florida: 9. Oklahoma: 1. Kentucky: 13. Arkansas: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 20 by 54.7. San José State: 7 by 31.3. UTEP: 9 by 58.2. Sam Houston: 14 by 53. Florida: 2 by 18.8. Oklahoma: 1 by 10.4. Kentucky: 3 by 45.1. Arkansas: 3 by 6.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins40.6 · Games = 7 · +31.6 vs Losses
Losses9 · Games = 1 · -31.6 vs Wins