Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2015Michigan State
TE • 6'5" • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Paul Lang reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
13
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
21
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Paul Lang, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Michigan State. Paul Lang reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 3 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 25.3 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 30.1 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 7 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 65.8 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 7 | 10 | 112 | 0 | 65.8 |
Related Context
Paul Lang played TE for Michigan State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Paul Lang recorded 136 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Michigan State paired 129 primary output with 72.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
18.4
Efficiency
72.1
Usage
8.5
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 17. Oregon: 3. Central Michigan: 9. Purdue: 14. Rutgers: 34. Indiana: 35. Iowa: 17
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 1 by 100. Oregon: 1 by 20. Central Michigan: 1 by 60. Purdue: 2 by 46.7. Rutgers: 2 by 100. Indiana: 3 by 77.8. Iowa: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Alabama
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 8 | 17.8 | 5.9 | 8 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | -8 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | -1 | 0 | 7.1 | -1 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 129 | 72.1 | 8.5 | 130 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 129 | 72.1 | 8.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Rutgers
Week 6 · W 31-24 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34
Receiving Yards
74.9 takeover
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Indiana
Week 8 · W 52-26 · Conference game
35
Receiving Yards
70.4 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#3
@ Iowa
Week 14 · W 16-13 · Conference game
17
Receiving Yards
56.5 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Alabama
Week 1 · L 0-38 · Postseason
17
Receiving Yards
55.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Ohio State
Week 5 · L 16-17 · Conference game
4
Receiving Yards
47.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Michigan State
129 primary output · 72.1 efficiency · 8.5 usage
65.8
#2
2015 Regular Season · Michigan State
65.8
129 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 8.5 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Michigan State
30.1
-1 primary · 0 efficiency · 7.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.