Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Michigan State paired 3,294 primary output with 61.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Postseason | Michigan State | 3 | 47 | 47 | 0 | 1 | 27.8 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 3 | 44 | 47 | -3 | 0 | 27.8 |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan State | 14 | 317 | 332 | -15 | 2 | 61.8 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 14 | 2,514 | 2,423 | 91 | 21 | 61.8 |
| 2014 Postseason | Michigan State | 13 | 325 | 314 | 11 | 2 | 65.9 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 13 | 2,969 | 2,900 | 69 | 24 | 65.9 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 13 | 186 | 210 | -24 | 0 | 64.5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 13 | 3,001 | 2,921 | 80 | 24 | 64.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Michigan State paired 3,294 primary output with 61.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with 416 yards of offense and 59.9 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
245.2
Efficiency
60
Usage
11.8
Consistency
74.8
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 186. Western Michigan: 256. Oregon: 196. Air Force: 243. Central Michigan: 159. Purdue: 187. Rutgers: 371. Michigan: 305. Indiana: 416. Nebraska: 342. Maryland: 84. Penn State: 243. Iowa: 199
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 46 by 43.3. Western Michigan: 31 by 72.4. Oregon: 34 by 55. Air Force: 30 by 63.7. Central Michigan: 22 by 68.5. Purdue: 24 by 81.3. Rutgers: 41 by 62.4. Michigan: 43 by 54.1. Indiana: 62 by 59.9. Nebraska: 41 by 61.1. Maryland: 22 by 44.3. Penn State: 27 by 63.1. Iowa: 37 by 50.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.