Usage Score
11.7
Player Dossier
2011-2015Michigan
Keith Heitzman
TE • 6'4" • Hilliard, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Keith Heitzman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.6
Consistency
41.7
Season Value
54.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Ohio
111213141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan • Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keith Heitzman, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Ohio. Keith Heitzman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Ohio paired 297 primary output with 64.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Ohio.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Ohio
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
29.7
Efficiency
64.6
Usage
11.7
Consistency
41.7
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 10. Idaho: 34. Marshall: 17. Unknown: 76. Minnesota: 42. Akron: 24. Western Michigan: 4. Buffalo: 83. Kent State: 2. Northern Illinois: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 1 by 66.7. Idaho: 4 by 56.7. Marshall: 2 by 56.7. Unknown: 3 by 100. Minnesota: 2 by 100. Akron: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 1 by 26.7. Buffalo: 6 by 92.2. Kent State: 1 by 13.3. Northern Illinois: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins16.4 · n=5 · -18.4 vs Losses
Losses34.8 · n=4 · +18.4 vs Wins
First Half35.8 · n=5 · +12.2 vs Second Half
Second Half23.6 · n=5 · -12.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | @ App State | L 29-31 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Wed 11/25 | @ Northern Illinois | W 26-21 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Wed 11/11 | vs Kent State | W 27-0 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Buffalo | L 17-41 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Western Michigan | L 14-49 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Akron | W 14-12 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Minnesota | L 24-27 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 76 | 25.3 | 25.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Marshall | W 21-10 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 9/4 | @ Idaho | W 45-28 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2011-2014
Opening stop
- 2
Ohio
2015
Final stop
Season Progression
201120122013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 32 | 70 | 5.4 | 32 |
| 2015 Postseason | Ohio | 297 | 64.6 | 11.7 | 265 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 297 | 64.6 | 11.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83
Primary metric
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
76
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
App State
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Akron
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Ohio
297 primary output · 64.6 efficiency · 11.7 usage
54.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Ohio
54.5
297 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 11.7 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Michigan
37.2
32 primary · 70 efficiency · 5.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8333
Hilliard Davidson · Hilliard, OH
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
329
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.