Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2024-2025Pittsburgh
Juelz Goff
RB • 5'9" • 195 lbs • York, PA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Juelz Goff leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.1 efficiency.
Efficiency
44.1
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
53.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Juelz Goff, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Juelz Goff leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.1 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 363 primary output with 44.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 44.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with 87 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
30.3
Efficiency
44.1
Usage
12.5
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 31. Central Michigan: 26. West Virginia: 50. Louisville: 44. Boston College: 87. Florida State: 4. Syracuse: 10. NC State: 14. Stanford: 8. Notre Dame: 37. Georgia Tech: 29. Miami: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 7 by 46.1. Central Michigan: 7 by 32.1. West Virginia: 10 by 49.7. Louisville: 9 by 48.9. Boston College: 19 by 40.8. Florida State: 1 by 41.7. Syracuse: 7 by 14.9. NC State: 2 by 47.9. Stanford: 2 by 41.7. Notre Dame: 7 by 65.8. Georgia Tech: 6 by 46.4. Miami: 4 by 53.1
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins25.4 · Games = 7 · -13.1 vs Losses
Losses38.5 · Games = 4 · +13.1 vs Wins
First Half40.3 · Games = 6 · +20.2 vs Second Half
Second Half20.2 · Games = 6 · -20.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Miami | L 7-38 | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5.8 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Georgia Tech | W 42-28 | 5 | 21 | 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4.8 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Notre Dame | L 15-37 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5.3 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Stanford | W 35-20 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs NC State | W 53-34 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 7 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Syracuse | W 30-13 | 7 | 10 | 1.40 | 1 | — | — | 1.4 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Florida State | W 34-31 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Boston College | W 48-7 | 17 | 59 | 3.50 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 4.6 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Louisville | L 27-34 | 7 | 32 | 4.60 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 4.9 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ West Virginia | L 24-31 | 8 | 37 | 4.60 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Central Michigan | W 45-17 | 6 | 16 | 2.70 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 3.7 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 31 | 4.40 | 1 | — | — | 4.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 94 | 44.1 | 12.3 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 94 | 44.1 | 12.3 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 363 | 44.1 | 12.5 | 269 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss with 59 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
59
Primary metric
59 scrimmage yards and 10.8 usage.
#2
Boston College
87
Primary metric
Win with 87 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
87 scrimmage yards and 25.3 usage.
#3
West Virginia
50
Primary metric
Loss with 50 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
50 scrimmage yards and 18.2 usage.
#4
Notre Dame
37
Primary metric
Loss with 37 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
37 scrimmage yards and 15.9 usage.
#5
Louisville
44
Primary metric
Loss with 44 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
44 scrimmage yards and 22.5 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
363 primary output · 44.1 efficiency · 12.5 usage
53.3
#2
2024 Postseason · Pittsburgh
36.1
94 primary · 44.1 efficiency · 12.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
36.1
94 primary · 44.1 efficiency · 12.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8714
Central York · York, PA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
457
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 15 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.