Usage Score
8.5
Player Dossier
2011-2012Houston
Mark Roberts
WR • 6'3" • Orange, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mark Roberts reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.9
Consistency
28.6
Season Value
50.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Houston
1112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mark Roberts, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Houston. Mark Roberts reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Houston paired 136 primary output with 84.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Houston
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
22.8
Efficiency
81.9
Usage
8.5
Consistency
28.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 18. Louisiana Tech: 10. UTEP: 12. East Carolina: 62. Tulsa: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 66.7. UTEP: 1 by 80. East Carolina: 5 by 82.7. Tulsa: 1 by 80
Split Comparison
Losses25.5 · n=4
First Half13.3 · n=3 · -23.7 vs Second Half
Second Half37 · n=2 · +23.7 vs First Half
All Games22.8 · n=5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas State
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2011-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Houston | 136 | 84.2 | 3.8 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Houston | 114 | 81.9 | 8.5 | -22 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62
Primary metric
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
47
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas State
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
North Texas
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Houston
136 primary output · 84.2 efficiency · 3.8 usage
58.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · Houston
50.5
114 primary · 81.9 efficiency · 8.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.805
West Orange-Stark · Orange, TX
- Committed To
- Houston
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
250
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.