Player Stats

Bram Kohlhausen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
858
Passing yards
794
Rushing yards
64
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonHouston00000-
2012 Regular SeasonHouston231310050.6
2014 PostseasonTCU328280030.5
2014 Regular SeasonTCU31415-1030.5
2015 PostseasonTCU639635145460.3
2015 Regular SeasonTCU638936920360.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

TCU paired 785 primary output with 67.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 67.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Houston, TCU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon

Win with 396 yards of offense and 64.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · TCU

Games

6

Primary Metric / G

130.8

Efficiency

67.1

Usage

9.8

Consistency

52.3

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 396. Stephen F. Austin: 112. Texas: 18. Iowa State: 8. Kansas: 119. Oklahoma: 132

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 56 by 64.8. Stephen F. Austin: 9 by 92.6. Texas: 4 by 56.9. Iowa State: 2 by 61.1. Kansas: 22 by 55. Oklahoma: 13 by 72

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins130.6 · Games = 5 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses132 · Games = 1 · +1.4 vs Wins