Usage Score
17
Player Dossier
2025-2025LSU
Harlem Berry
RB • 5'11" • 190 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Harlem Berry leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.6 efficiency.
Efficiency
45.6
Consistency
62.2
Season Value
56.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · LSU
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Harlem Berry, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · LSU. Harlem Berry leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.6 efficiency.
Harlem Berry played RB for LSU. Across 1 tracked season, Harlem Berry recorded 491 rushing yards, 32 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with LSU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
LSU paired 523 primary output with 45.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Win with 82 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · LSU
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
40.2
Efficiency
45.6
Usage
17
Consistency
62.2
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 45. Clemson: 1. Louisiana Tech: 56. Florida: 2. Unknown: 28. Ole Miss: 24. South Carolina: 4. Vanderbilt: 55. Texas A&M: 59. Alabama: 66. Arkansas: 76. Western Kentucky: 82. Oklahoma: 25
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 3 by 100. Clemson: 1 by 10.4. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 88.9. Florida: 1 by 20.8. Unknown: 7 by 41.7. Ole Miss: 8 by 32.1. South Carolina: 5 by 6.5. Vanderbilt: 11 by 52.1. Texas A&M: 9 by 68.3. Alabama: 12 by 57.3. Arkansas: 14 by 52.2. Western Kentucky: 20 by 44.9. Oklahoma: 15 by 17.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins36.8 · Games = 6 · -8.8 vs Losses
Losses45.7 · Games = 6 · +8.8 vs Wins
First Half22.9 · Games = 7 · -37.6 vs Second Half
Second Half60.5 · Games = 6 · +37.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/28 | @ Houston | L 35-38 | 3 | 45 | 15 | 0 | — | — | 15 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Oklahoma | L 13-17 | 14 | 23 | 1.60 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.7 |
| Sun 11/23 | vs Western Kentucky | W 13-10 | 18 | 80 | 4.40 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4.1 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Arkansas | W 23-22 | 11 | 52 | 4.70 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 5.4 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Alabama | L 9-20 | 12 | 66 | 5.50 | 0 | — | — | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Texas A&M | L 25-49 | 9 | 59 | 6.60 | 1 | — | — | 6.6 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Vanderbilt | L 24-31 | 11 | 55 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs South Carolina | W 20-10 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.8 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Ole Miss | L 19-24 | 7 | 22 | 3.10 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 28 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Florida | W 20-10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 23-7 | 6 | 56 | 9.30 | 0 | — | — | 9.3 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Clemson | W 17-10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | LSU | 523 | 45.6 | 17 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | LSU | 523 | 45.6 | 17 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Win with 82 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
82
Primary metric
82 scrimmage yards and 32.3 usage.
#2
Arkansas
76
Primary metric
Win with 76 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
76 scrimmage yards and 23.7 usage.
#3
Louisiana Tech
56
Primary metric
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
56 scrimmage yards and 10 usage.
#4
Houston
45
Primary metric
Loss with 45 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
45 scrimmage yards and 7.5 usage.
#5
Alabama
66
Primary metric
Loss with 66 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
66 scrimmage yards and 24.5 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · LSU
523 primary output · 45.6 efficiency · 17 usage
56.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · LSU
56.2
523 primary · 45.6 efficiency · 17 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.9919
St Martin's Episcopal School · Metairie, LA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
523
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 13 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.