Usage Score
11.7
Player Dossier
2023-2025North Texas
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Denton, TX, USA
Landon Sides reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.7
Efficiency
75.9
Consistency
43.4
Season Value
57.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Landon Sides, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · North Texas. Landon Sides reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Landon Sides played WR for North Texas. Across 3 tracked seasons, Landon Sides recorded 25 rushing yards, 1,092 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with North Texas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
North Texas paired 449 primary output with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
34.5
Efficiency
75.9
Usage
11.7
Consistency
43.4
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 49. Western Michigan: 41. Washington State: 37. Army: 68. South Alabama: 11. South Florida: 24. UTSA: 0. Charlotte: 114. Navy: 44. UAB: 7. Rice: 23. Temple: 20. Tulane: 11
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 5 by 65.3. Western Michigan: 2 by 100. Washington State: 3 by 82.2. Army: 6 by 75.6. South Alabama: 1 by 73.3. South Florida: 3 by 53.3. Charlotte: 5 by 100. Navy: 3 by 97.8. UAB: 1 by 46.7. Rice: 2 by 76.7. Temple: 2 by 66.7. Tulane: 1 by 73.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
100 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ San Diego State | W 49-47 | — | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Tulane | L 21-34 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Temple | W 52-25 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Rice | W 56-24 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ UAB | W 53-24 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Navy | W 31-17 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Fri 10/24 | @ Charlotte100 receiving yards | W 54-20 | — | 5 | 114 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 0 | 60 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs UTSA | W 55-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 10/10 | vs South Florida | L 36-63 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs South Alabama | W 36-22 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Army | W 45-38 | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Washington State | W 59-10 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Western Michigan | W 33-30 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 32 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | North Texas | 363 | 71.4 | 11.1 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | North Texas | 280 | 65.2 | 8.6 | -83 |
| 2024 Regular Season | North Texas | 280 | 65.2 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | North Texas | 449 | 75.9 | 11.7 | 169 |
| 2025 Regular Season | North Texas | 449 | 75.9 | 11.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Primary metric
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas State
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Charlotte
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
61
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 81.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · North Texas
449 primary output · 75.9 efficiency · 11.7 usage
57.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · North Texas
57.8
449 primary · 75.9 efficiency · 11.7 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · North Texas
55
363 primary · 71.4 efficiency · 11.1 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8306
Guyer · Denton, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,092
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.