Usage Score
26.2
Player Profile
Shaq Washington
WR • 5'9" • Maple Hts., OH, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Shaq Washington reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.1
Consistency
71.8
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
1112131314141515
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Primary stop by seasons
- Cincinnati
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Shaq Washington, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati. Shaq Washington reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 982 primary output with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.5
Efficiency
71.1
Usage
26.2
Consistency
71.8
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 11. Unknown: 69. Temple: 53. Miami (OH): 44. Memphis: 120. Miami: 106. BYU: 103. UConn: 78. UCF: 72. Houston: 59. Tulsa: 91. South Florida: 52. East Carolina: 124
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 2 by 36.7. Unknown: 7 by 65.7. Temple: 6 by 58.9. Miami (OH): 4 by 73.3. Memphis: 9 by 88.9. Miami: 8 by 88.3. BYU: 5 by 100. UConn: 8 by 65. UCF: 8 by 60. Houston: 4 by 98.3. Tulsa: 8 by 75.8. South Florida: 6 by 57.8. East Carolina: 15 by 55.1
Split Comparison
Wins85.8 · n=6 · +19.5 vs Losses
Losses66.3 · n=6 · -19.5 vs Wins
First Half72.3 · n=7 · -7.0 vs Second Half
Second Half79.3 · n=6 · +7.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
100 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/25 | vs San Diego State | L 7-42 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 19-16 | — | 15 | 124 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ South Florida | L 27-65 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs TulsaHigh volume | W 49-38 | — | 8 | 91 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Houston | L 30-33 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs UCFHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 52-7 | — | 8 | 72 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs UConnHigh volume | W 37-13 | — | 8 | 78 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ BYU100 receiving yards | L 24-38 | — | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 0 | 46 |
| Thu 10/1 | vs Miami100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-23 | — | 8 | 106 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Thu 9/24 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 46-53 | — | 9 | 120 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-33 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Temple | L 26-34 | — | 6 | 53 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 13 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 14 | 25 | 11.3 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 23 | 51.1 | 15 | 9 |
| 2013 Postseason | Cincinnati | 783 | 64.7 | 23.6 | 760 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 783 | 64.7 | 23.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Cincinnati | 761 | 70.8 | 22.5 | -22 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 761 | 70.8 | 22.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Cincinnati | 982 | 71.1 | 26.2 | 221 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 982 | 71.1 | 26.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
163
Primary metric
163 receiving yards with a 90.6 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
BYU
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
982 primary output · 71.1 efficiency · 26.2 usage
67.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Cincinnati
67.3
982 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 26.2 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Cincinnati
58
761 primary · 70.8 efficiency · 22.5 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,563
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.