Usage Score
15.9
Player Dossier
2011-2015Cincinnati
Max Morrison
WR • 6'1" • Kenton, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Max Morrison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.7
Consistency
51.8
Season Value
59.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
1112131314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Max Morrison, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Cincinnati. Max Morrison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 447 primary output with 85.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.5
Efficiency
69.7
Usage
15.9
Consistency
51.8
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 84. Unknown: 48. Temple: 54. Miami (OH): 26. Memphis: 162. Miami: 61. BYU: 31. UConn: 22. UCF: -1. Houston: 47. Tulsa: 40. South Florida: 11. East Carolina: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 7 by 80. Unknown: 3 by 100. Temple: 4 by 90. Miami (OH): 3 by 57.8. Memphis: 9 by 100. Miami: 5 by 81.3. BYU: 4 by 51.7. UConn: 2 by 73.3. UCF: 2 by 0. Houston: 4 by 78.3. Tulsa: 4 by 66.7. South Florida: 1 by 73.3. East Carolina: 4 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins30 · n=6 · -34.8 vs Losses
Losses64.8 · n=6 · +34.8 vs Wins
First Half66.6 · n=7 · +41.4 vs Second Half
Second Half25.2 · n=6 · -41.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/25 | vs San Diego State | L 7-42 | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ East Carolina | W 19-16 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ South Florida | L 27-65 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Tulsa | W 49-38 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Houston | L 30-33 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs UCF | W 52-7 | — | 2 | -1 | -0.5 | -0.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs UConn | W 37-13 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ BYU | L 24-38 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 10/1 | vs Miami | W 34-23 | — | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 38 |
| Thu 9/24 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 46-53 | — | 9 | 162 | 18 | 18 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-33 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Temple | L 26-34 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 35 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Cincinnati | 447 | 85.7 | 9.7 | 447 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 447 | 85.7 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Cincinnati | 458 | 65.2 | 16.2 | 11 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 458 | 65.2 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Cincinnati | 617 | 69.7 | 15.9 | 159 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 617 | 69.7 | 15.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162
Primary metric
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
87
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Purdue
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulane
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 76 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
447 primary output · 85.7 efficiency · 9.7 usage
60.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Cincinnati
60.4
447 primary · 85.7 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
59.3
617 primary · 69.7 efficiency · 15.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,522
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.