Player Dossier

2011-2015

Cincinnati

Chris Moore

WR • 6'2" • Tampa, FL, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Chris Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

13.2

Efficiency

94.2

Consistency

63.5

Season Value

67.7

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati

111212131314141515

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
9
Program Path
Cincinnati
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Chris Moore, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati. Chris Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Chris Moore played WR for Cincinnati. Across 5 tracked seasons, Chris Moore recorded 26 rushing yards, 2,301 receiving yards, and 26 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Cincinnati.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 870 primary output with 94.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 94.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

79.1

Efficiency

94.2

Usage

13.2

Consistency

63.5

Best Game by takeover score

San Diego State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 47. Unknown: 41. Temple: 48. Miami (OH): 73. Memphis: 153. UConn: 31. UCF: 108. Houston: 140. Tulsa: 77. South Florida: 131. East Carolina: 21

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Temple: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 5 by 97.3. Memphis: 5 by 100. UConn: 3 by 68.9. UCF: 3 by 100. Houston: 6 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 100. South Florida: 6 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 70

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins62 · Games = 5 · -41.8 vs Losses
Losses103.8 · Games = 5 · +41.8 vs Wins
First Half65.5 · Games = 6 · -29.9 vs Second Half
Second Half95.4 · Games = 5 · +29.9 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Memphis

Best efficiency game

100 vs San Diego State

Result
Fri 12/25vs San Diego StateL 7-421474747047
Sat 11/28@ East CarolinaW 19-1622110.510.50012
Sat 11/21@ South Florida100 receiving yardsL 27-65613121.821.80154
Sun 11/15vs TulsaW 49-3847719.319.30143
Sat 11/7@ Houston100 receiving yards · 2+ TDL 30-33614023.323.30235
Sat 10/31vs UCF100 receiving yardsW 52-731083636149
Sat 10/24vs UConnW 37-133318.810.30019
Thu 9/24@ Memphis100 receiving yardsL 46-53515326.530.60168
Sat 9/19@ Miami (OH)W 37-3357314.614.60135
Sun 9/13vs TempleL 26-343481616024
Sun 9/6vs Unknown24120.520.50025

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Cincinnati

    2011-2015

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201120122012201320132014201420152015
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2011 Regular SeasonCincinnati0
2012 PostseasonCincinnati11388.36.8113
2012 Regular SeasonCincinnati11388.36.80
2013 PostseasonCincinnati64582.914.5532
2013 Regular SeasonCincinnati64582.914.50
2014 PostseasonCincinnati67385.913.328
2014 Regular SeasonCincinnati67385.913.30
2015 PostseasonCincinnati87094.213.2197
2015 Regular SeasonCincinnati87094.213.20

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Louisville

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

92

Primary metric

92 receiving yards with a 87.6 efficiency score.

#2

Ohio State

221

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

221 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Memphis

153

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Houston

140

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Temple

65

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2015 Postseason · Cincinnati

870 primary output · 94.2 efficiency · 13.2 usage

67.7

#2

2015 Regular Season · Cincinnati

67.7

870 primary · 94.2 efficiency · 13.2 usage

#3

2013 Postseason · Cincinnati

61.7

645 primary · 82.9 efficiency · 14.5 usage

Milestones

6

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

6

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2021 · Rating 0.8596

Gaither · Tampa, FL

Committed To
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2021

Career Facts

1

Career teams

9

Seasons tracked

2,301

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.